1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Comparison of QPR squads 2011 and 2014

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by SRR, Jul 21, 2014.

  1. SRR

    SRR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    380
    I read a comment in a previous thread that our quad at the moment would be the flimsiest Premier League squad of all time. The squad below is our 2011-2012 one, and this is after we "strengthened" it with players such as Barton, Young, SWP, Rio's lesser half etc.

    Kenny, Orr, Hill, Derry, Hall, Gabbidon, Taarabt, K Dyer, Campbell, Bothroyd, Faurlin, Mackie, Traore, Buzsaky, Perone, Connolly, Barton, L Young, Smith, Helguson, Cerny, B Murphy, Wright-Phillips, A Ferdinand, Puncheon.

    Interesting to compare and contrast and see where we are at the moment. I believe that our squad as it stands is stronger and this is without a number of new additions that we will inevitably have, hopefully before too long. That season we incredibly managed to stay up. This gives me some confidence that the season will not be as full of doom and gloom as some are predicting.
     
    #1
  2. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    35,922
    Likes Received:
    19,538
    I agree. I actually think our present squad, along with Caulker and another forward, attacking midfielder and a right back/wing back will hold its own.
     
    #2
  3. KPDHoopster

    KPDHoopster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    563
    I agree as well.

    I feel certain posters have expectations far too high as to the calibre of players required to survive.

    Considering shortage of funds, it will be camaraderie and work ethic that will keep us up, not a few superstar signings.

    I feel we still need (assuming Caulker signs) 2 forwards, 2 midfielders, and a right WB.
     
    #3
  4. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    35,922
    Likes Received:
    19,538
    FFS!! I agree again!!

    Stop it now!
     
    #4
  5. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    29,376
    Likes Received:
    26,922
    Depends on the shape we play and whether Redknapp rates any of the youngsters enough to play them, but fundamentally.........I agree too!!!!
     
    #5
  6. Quite Possibly Raving

    Quite Possibly Raving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,152
    Likes Received:
    5,374
    I agree too.

    'Keepers

    Green fine in goal. Not top half class, but continuity is important, and when confident, he is adequate for a club trying to establish in the PL.

    Defence

    Yun, Simpson, Ferdinand, Caulker (if poss) and Onuoha all good enough to be first choice defenders. Dunne, Hill, Traore offering back up. Ideally one more defender (aside from Caulker) to be added.

    Centre Mid

    Granero (I think he will come good), Barton, Faurlin form strong CM options. I wouldn't mind seeing O'Neil signed as competition/backup - he really was played out of position last season and I thought he impressed in the centre. The West Ham kid on trial might also provide backup.

    Wingers

    On the wings, I think Phillips will do very well, with Hoilett adequate. Traore another option. Another winger is a necessity if you ask me as with those three being quite pacey, they will pick up injuries. We need four decent wingers.

    Attack

    Austin is obviously our best bet. Zamora fine as a third choice striker (assuming we are playing one up top). We do need to replace Remy, and a fourth striker wouldn't exactly hurt - especially if we have funds from selling Remy and Taarbat.

    Additions needed

    Based on that very quick analysis, I would say we need two more defenders (Caulker and wing back), potentially another CM, one more winger, and one (or two) more strikers.

    That would make a total of six new signings, which would hopefully ensure that we keep the team spirit from the playoffs going, and don't rock the boat too much, but have the necessary quality to survive!
     
    #6
  7. DT Footspa

    DT Footspa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    40
    I hope we are as good as Harold got us with the ball ... Worried when we haven't got it
     
    #7
  8. DT Footspa

    DT Footspa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    40
    Fantasy football on paper
    These players should be in by now IMO

    With the ball agree could be solid
    But we looked very poor without it
     
    #8
  9. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    35,922
    Likes Received:
    19,538
    Wingers may not be so important if we are to play 3-5-2 though. The wing backs are the wingers in that formation.
     
    #9
  10. Uber_Hoop

    Uber_Hoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    27,431
    Little to disagree with there, Raver. The CM vacancy you refer to needs to be a creative midfielder. If Granero comes good then that's fine, but he'll need cover. One would hope Messrs Phillips and Hoilett will provide service from the wings, but we still need the chap in the middle, pulling the strings, controlling the tempo, creating the opportunities from almost nothing with an incisive through ball etc.
     
    #10

  11. Quite Possibly Raving

    Quite Possibly Raving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,152
    Likes Received:
    5,374
    As both Uber and Col point out - it does depend on the formation. I guess if we really do play 3-5-2, scrap my comment about the winger, get another wing back, and Phillips can be the extra man in the midfield to compete with Granero.

    I personally also wouldn't write off Henry as an option at DCM. I know that is highly unpopular, but you look at how many points we got when he played compared to when he didn't...his job isn't pretty, and doesn't cover him in glory, but I don't think that means there is no part for him to play next year.
     
    #11
  12. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    29,376
    Likes Received:
    26,922
    How many points did we get when Henry played vs when he didn't? Not being funny, I really don't have a clue.
     
    #12
  13. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    35,922
    Likes Received:
    19,538
    Players like Henry can be vital. All teams need their water carriers.
     
    #13
  14. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    29,376
    Likes Received:
    26,922
    Agree, but do you need him with Rio playing sweeper in a back 3, surely he'd just get in the way? Mind you, if we had Gary Medel or Nigel de Jong I'd play them.
     
    #14
  15. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    35,922
    Likes Received:
    19,538
    Possibly not so much with a back 3 you're right.

    Have to say a back 3 of Ned, Rio and Caulker sounds a bit tasty to me.
     
    #15
  16. FinnHoop

    FinnHoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    25
    Henry played in 27 games, W16 D6 L5, 54 pts, GF 40 - GA 28 GD +12 (avg 2.00 pts/g)
    vs. didn't play in 19 games, W7 D5 L7, 26 pts, GF 20 - GA 16 GD +4 (avg 1.37 pts/g)

    That doesn't tell the whole truth though, he often came on in late game to secure a win/draw (which he did very well)
    He was brought in 7 times in the last 0 to 13 mins, W6 D1 L0.
     
    #16
  17. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    29,376
    Likes Received:
    26,922
    That's actually very impressive. I'm sure that there are other factors at play, but a specialist DCM obviously made a difference.
     
    #17
  18. awjm

    awjm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    5,614
    Likes Received:
    2,441
    It was so clear last season that we needed someone like him or O'Neill in the role as neither Barton nor Carroll could do it. I don't like the idea of Barton bossing the centre. He's a good player but should be pushed forward a bit, with someone steady behind him.
     
    #18
  19. qprbeth

    qprbeth Wicked Witch of West12
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    14,497
    Likes Received:
    12,811
    People like O'Neil, Henry, Zamora, Traore and Collison (if signed) are vital to the squad strength. We should not follow the Citeh mould of having superstars on the bench (Mark Hughes tried that, it did not work)
    We need players like the five mentioned to be in the squad, be hungry and good enough to play role, when required....coming on to close down a match , to score a goal, to change the formation.
    We do not want players coming in on inflated wages and then disturbing the peace, because they are not playing. We cannot buy players for the "squad", they have to be already in place.

    I am fairly happy with our squad players...they are definitely good enough for a midtable Prem team....


    But that doesn't mean I do not think we need a couple more first-team starters to give us that little edge...if Caulker signs, we still need another forward and a creative midfielder (but I am still hoping this will be Graneros moment to shine)
     
    #19
  20. SW Ranger

    SW Ranger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,175
    Likes Received:
    7,821
    Centre of the park has the potential risk of crumbling down to bare bones with Faurlin and Granero both coming back from serious injuries and neither comes with a guarantee that there won't be a recurrence. This new system,for us, being talked about means plenty of cover but we can't be playing with anything less than 11 men on the park. We need a new CM - and someone with experience and a playmaker. We all know it will be a sound investment in the end.
     
    #20

Share This Page