Dr Strangelove (how I learned to stop worrying and love Boris)

Sigh.

And I didn't say everyone either.

Neither am I saying the inquiry will be flawed. I'm saying don't leave any loopholes for him to escape out of, or he will.

Everyone who goes through the gate is recorded. However, he could say family members were dropping things off for him (as many people did for others during that time). You need the evidence from staff in attendance that there was a physical meeting that went against the regulations to prove it conclusively or he'll wiggle out of it.

Your blinding hatred and desperation to scream guilty without without any kind of reason or sense is the predictable thing here, I'm afraid.

But by all means, mention man crushes again, I'm sure that'll 'win' it for you.

 

You're getting hysterical again man, calm down.

Quite right, it's all just speculation and opinion.

I was just having a bit of fun.

Whether it's now, or after the enquiry, none of us will know the entire procedure.

TBH I couldn't care less if he's found guilty or not, it won't change my mind and I doubt it'll change anyone else's. He's a bit of an irrelevance and this enquiry is just part of the soap opera.

 

Just having a bit of fun, eh?

Just the usual backtracking and 'it was just a jolly play on words' ...

... if you're not prepared to back yersel up don't act the big shot.

Anyone that has to say 'it was just a joke' is usually either a liar or a coward.

Or both.

 

I stand by what I've said, no problem.

It's just possible to put your points while having fun watching you twisting yourself inside out.

You seem to think you're addressing the nation and making a difference ...

... it's a little chat forum with half a dozen people on the thread

You're constantly chasing your little victories which shows what kind of person you are ....

... do you never leave the house.

 

Have neither of you two got any work to do

 

Pontificates on thing being bad.

Does thing.

Accuses others of 'twisting themselves inside out' when rumbled.

I want to discuss. I discuss with others with none of this rigmarole. You've made it very clear that you want to win, so our interactions are treated as such.

You can discuss properly any time you like, if you're able to any more.

 

No they haven't given me your job yet

 

It would if this information wasn't made available to the previous enquiry for some err reason

Then again it might have been outside the scope of that review and all perfectly innocent

 

Or they looked at who attended some of these other "events" and thought "hmm, let's not go there".

 

Exactly. Partygate wasn't a mortal wound, he carried on for seven months before going.
If it had been revealed by the media that he was seeing friends and family at Chequers rather than people who would have been in Number 10 anyway he wouldn't have lasted seven days.

Did it happen.
Who knew about it and when.

 

I expect that's why they're having an enquiry tbh.

I've no idea how these things work but, once reported, I expect there has to be some action ...
For some people, if there is action it's a witch hunt ...

... for others, if there isn't it's a cover up.

I just think it's normal procedure because everyone should be accountable. You can't have one rule for us and another for them otherwise it stops being a democracy.

 

Looks like that speed awareness course was well worth it Suella.

 

‘Inaccurate’ grooming gang claims putting children at risk, Sunak and Braverman told

"Politicians who make “inaccurate or divisive claims” about child sexual abuse and grooming gangs undermine efforts to tackle the crime and almost certainly make children less safe, organisations and experts in the subject have warned in an unprecedented joint letter.

The letter, signed by 50 researchers and more than a dozen organisations, including the NSPCC and Victim Support, urges Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak to avoid narratives on abuse based on“misinformation, racism and division”."

 

Rishi Sunak faces Tory backlash as net migration reaches record high

Prime minister says numbers are ‘too high’ after ONS data showing net migration into UK for 2022 was 606,000

• UK politics live – latest updates

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Thu 25 May 2023 14.39 BST

"Rishi Sunak has been accused of abandoning control of UK borders and faces a backlash from Conservative MPs after net migration and the backlog of asylum claims reached record highs, it emerged on Thursday."

 

Looking like Suella speeding was probably all a smokescreen to deflect from the net migration Bombshell

 

Their stance on this has been awful in my opinion. There really was never any need to speak about it in the way they did. It seemed to somehow lessen what is a very serious problem.

 

It was Labour that made her speeding last year a story mate, not the tories. I cant believe all the nonsense made of it personally. Not even newsworthy, never mind inquiry worthy.

 

"Taking back control" of immigration iirc

 

Correct, grooming is absolutely wrong as is illegal immigration.

Naming particular nationalities, or origins, is unnecessary and creates division which leads to friction.

Instead of simply using extreme rhetoric, and endless slogans, just quietly get on with the job ...

... don't keep boasting about building 40 new hospitals, get some spades in the ground.

 

Another good slogan ... another poor delivery.

They keep saying they're intent on delivering, for the British people ...

... sadly they keep going to the wrong address, on the wrong day, and leaving a note saying no one was in to accept the package.