1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

I'l be back in a week

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by jimjamsafc, Sep 10, 2011.

  1. jimjamsafc

    jimjamsafc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    1
    Had a second goal found it's way in during that last minute every word on here would have been different. Chelsea are title chasing. We did well to get back in to it in the 2nd half. I thought bendtner ji and wickham all looked promising and gardener was very good. The Gyan debacle happened an hour before kick off, it is a miracle we didn't loose 6-0. Get some reality guys.
     
    #1
  2. bonnybobbypark

    bonnybobbypark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,463
    Likes Received:
    750
    Why, absolutely bully

    x
     
    #2
  3. MackemsRule

    MackemsRule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,621
    Likes Received:
    118
    Ok we will just ignore the **** that happened on the pitch. <ok>
    We made Chelsea look better than they actually are.
     
    #3
  4. Apone

    Apone Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    15
    Sorry mate there's no way to dress it up. We were shocking just like nearly every home game in 2011
     
    #4
  5. Keane prods the giant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    3
    I disagree with EVERY SINGLE POINT you've just made. You'll have had a couple of the usual happy clappers who'll have tried to spin some bullshit had we found the second goal, but not analytical observative knowledgable people like me. You've just said Gardner was very good, which makes me seriously question your understanding of the game. The lad was completely anonymous. To hose 6 nil to that Chelsea team was plain impossible, no matter how bad things had been, or at least not with Brown in defence. I suggest you ought to get some reality, because that was diabolical.
     
    #5
  6. jimjamsafc

    jimjamsafc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gardener made some runs from midfield that we have been missing for some time; I wasn't expecting much agreement, im not pro Bruce, I just think loosing 2-1 to Chelsea is no shame. The biggest problem and what should be topic of discussing is gyan. But instead the board is just full of Bruce out.
     
    #6
  7. MackemsRule

    MackemsRule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,621
    Likes Received:
    118
    jimjam you stated every word on here would be different.
    IMHO it wouldn't, unless you think an equaliser stops us seeing what happens on the pitch?

    For 85 minutes we made a very average Chelsea look like title contenders.
     
    #7
  8. jimjamsafc

    jimjamsafc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    1
    I do get it, we weren't great but I have felt a lot more disappointed and frustrated with our play recently than I did today
     
    #8
  9. bonnybobbypark

    bonnybobbypark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,463
    Likes Received:
    750
    So glad people think we did well getting beat 2 1 at home. Puts me in my place.

    x
     
    #9
  10. Keane prods the giant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    3
    I can only assume you are very, very easily pleased, mate. The entire midfield was absent. The midfield was nothing. We, for all intents and purposes, playing with four defensive midfielders today. I wish i could somehow find the words to explain what an unforgivable abomination that is.
     
    #10

  11. smithy in nl

    smithy in nl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,291
    Likes Received:
    5,323
    i agree with you mate didnt think we were that bad at all!!
     
    #11

Share This Page