But they couldn't then claim they consulted with supporters. I think they've divided the concessionary voters so many ways, option A will win comfortably ( IF they have the 40 % turn out). Put it this way, if B was winning, they wouldn't be ringing round to muster those extra votes than get to 40%
They were already claiming to have consulted with supporters a year ago. There's really no reason they had to hold this poll. I think it's just a desperate attempt to win back some fans now that we matter to them financially, but it's infected with the usual combination of Ehab's incompetence and stubbornness. In short, I really don't think they particularly want us to vote A. They are both Ehab options which he has allowed us to be offered, so he'll see either as a victory for him.
Everything they do is for a reason. Usually spiteful but always divisive. Less than 40% and they can claim yet again they have tried to consult with supporters (and get the football supporters body (?) off their back. Option A wins, their ridiculed and hated no concessions has been vindicated by supporters and keep same body off their back. Option B mustn't happen and they'll do everything to make sure it doesn't, so load it. If it did then theres the consolation we have already voted to move from north stand. So they can get rid of that loathsome section. Many will go due to cost/ principle of been move. They'll ensure the rest are divided around the ground. And all they actually did was try to consult with fans.
I sit in W5 so do not seem to exist in any of these models..I don’t get any correspondence or phone calls about anything. However I have recently received 3 letters about changing my direct debit collection method, Has anyone else received these?
I think we should have a supporters ballot akin to the one he has organised. It would go something along the lines of he has two options. Option a) having your ears cut off. Option b) having your tongue surgically removed. Option 'a' would not allow the individual to live within a 12,000 mile radius of Hull and he would have to dispose of all assets donating everything to the citizens of Hull. Option 'b' would require the individual to reside in rented accommodation as close as possible to the stadium, dispose of all assets (donating them to the club), volunteer to work at the ground for 30 hours a week and visit Geoff on a weekly basis to undertake whatever menial tasks he has lined up for him. This would meet the criteria of owner/supporter consultation. The only drawback I can see with this plan is it would require a response rate of 100%.
Club just posted: “Voting has now closed for the Ticket Model Vote. We'd like to thank all Members who took the time to participate. We can confirm that we received 44.7% of votes and the results will be published this Friday, along with next steps.”
Well, I'm pleased it reached over 40%, even though the whole episode of these votes is idiotic, at least Ehab can't say the silent majority have had their say by not voting. Though why wait until Friday for the result, surely they know the outcome now?
As always, Ehab uses words that don't quite mean what normal people assume they mean. He says he wants to build bridges, but he doesn't say he will cross them.