New Owners - 3 rival parties

Things are not ****e right now, they're brilliant. Record 3rd season in the top division. Best squad in our history. Most successful manager ever. What's wrong? A Chairman who is seemingly obsessed with the name change (which will never happen), er... that's it. I have a big pair of hairy balls, thank you. Stop being a drama queen.

 

I was replying to Happy Tiger and his list of worries if we got a new owner.

I didn't say anything about our current form or position.

And i think you knew that.

So you're either a pedantic twat, or another Allam aide rushing to defend him and getting it all wrong as usual.

 

I was replying to someone else who asked for a list.

You bleated about my list then did one of your own.

You sound like one of the minority gobshites who talk a lot but do **** all. Except talk bollocks.

Your post sums up the politics of the situation which is your self serving agenda, faux outrage at what you see as sleights against you while you happily dish it out. Dickheads being angry.

 

He's a dickhead, I'm a twat, apparently because we disagree with your assertion that things couldn't be much worse. God knows what that makes you, but I doubt it would survive the censor program. It's a great time to be a supporter of Hull City and it's tragic that a minority - of which you are a part - fails to appreciate this moment, the best in the club's history, all because you think the Chairman doesn't respect you. Asshat.

 

The difference is I'm referring to the Allams in my posts. And why you're wrong to support them, whilst calling you twats.

You're just being mean to me. Booo.

****er.

 

Did we survive relegation that year by less than 9 points?

 

What's wrong?

Apart from the name change...

Changing the club badge without promised consultation is wrong.
Charging fans £50 for a league match is wrong.
Withholding the ASI money for away fans is wrong.
Increasing season tickets for a 2nd year running is wrong.
Evicting local sports club's from the Arena (against terms of the lease) is wrong.

Need I go on?

 

In fairness apart from the ASI money and the Airco Arena issues, plenty of other decent chairman have done those other things.

 

Being a toad yet living amongst the human race, also wrong.

 

Can you name the chairmen who have changed their clubs name because it was lousy?

 

So for you, success on the pitch is all that matters. The club itself can do and be whatever, as long as it's in the Premier League.

There's plenty of more successful teams you could follow if it's that simple.

 

Our team is already successful. If you don't like the way ours is run, there's plenty of, by your expectations, better run clubs you could follow too.

 

Yes, Hull City is successful. No need to change it then.

 

You don't want it to be more successful? Figures.

 

Is this the same chairman who considers all fans (including those who agree with him, bear in mind) irrelevant?

Just wondering.

 

Yes, I want Hull City to be more successful. Don't you?

 

At the risk of us both sounding like Fez... Yes of course I do. No, I do not see the problem with a name change in that scenario, just to anticipate your followup about the club wouldn't then be Hull City.

I think we're done with this exchange.

 

I want to see Hull City do well. You want to see a club do well whose name is unimportant as long as it in the PL.
Come back with this stupid justification of changing the name when other clubs decide it would be of benefit. Do you seriously think the big clubs wouldn't have done this if they thought it would bring in extra money?

 

I just laugh at Allam when he goes off on one - including when he says fans are irrelevant. I don't care what he says, just so long as he continues to support Steve Bruce and maintains the club's financial security. He isn't going to be successful in his bid to change the club's name, so why get so worked up about it? We are enjoying the most successful period in the club's history, yet people persist in criticising AA as the worst chairman we ever had and some reckon Steve Bruce makes too many mistakes and isn't a top manager. So how come we're doing so well?

 

If he isn't going to be successful in changing the club's name, it's partly BECAUSE some people have got "worked up about it" and taken action as best they could. You are confusing cause and effect Bobby.