I think we're losing sight of what's really important here, and it's that Peter Lawwell's daughter would get pumped silly!!
EVERYONE knows about Celtic and the cover up of the child molestation that took place there. I make it my mission to inform all of those that never KNEW... The stench of paedophilia will never leave Celtic. Some things just won't go away and the stigma of paedophelia is a lasting one. You're soiled goods.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19137624 They removed the testimonial........ please log in to view this image
Inspector Rocket finds the testimonial - the one Harper MacLeod didn't want you to see. Old Pete certainly knows how to butter them up - I'll give him that. please log in to view this image
Worth noting that Lawwell singles out Rod McKenzie for special praise. Here's Rod: please log in to view this image http://www.harpermacleod.co.uk/70-mckenzie In my view Lawwell sees McKenzie as the man to carry out the hatchet job on Rangers. Represented the Blessed Martin and is still "on the tools " while providing great support for Celtic. Yes, the very man to investigate Rangers, of course he is. No conflict of interest there - none at all....
I see you have objected to harper mcleod saying that we would be the main beneficiaries, how exactly? Apart from changing the number of titles we have won, we aren't going to be given any money.
She looks like she'd be a target for ivory poachers but aye, still would. And the other two women too
Answered your own question in part there. As for the financial implications........ I suspect litigation would be Penn State's next step due to loss of earnings by not gaining entry to the Champions League.... we're talking major amounts of money.
Any Legal firm which represents Celtic should not be allowed to investigate Rangers. What's so difficult to understand about that ? Wher's the $porting Int£grity here ?