Rival watch

See, you just can't admit your golden boys as dirty as the rest can ya

 

please log in to view this image

 

Ok mate I've put you through enough this morning, soz yh

 

Seeing Sucky spiral here, and the mention of our Brian,
automatically suggests we bring the following over from
the "Mouser watch" ...

please log in to view this image

 

That's ok. I know you lot have to take up the call to arms on social media.
An ex-Chelsea player slagged off Salah for diving when he did, so you've got to talk about Harry Kane a lot.

 

Reaching there a bit don't ya think?

Just throwing some much deserved shade on golden boy hazza.

I didnt expect anyone to admit he buys pens like, this is the spurs equivalent of a David ike thread tbh, which is what makes it so much fun

 

Did Kane dive for that pen yday?

Go on give it a try

 

I don't even think that anyone other than you is claiming that he did. It's a bizarre claim, frankly.
It's clearly not a dive. You can claim that he fouled Lallana or was looking for it and initiated contact, but a dive? What?

Salah dived and people were talking about it, so Liverpool have to claim that they're being persecuted and find someone to blame.
It's obviously Harry Kane's fault, because Tony Cascarino had a go at Salah...
Makes a change from blaming Pickford, I guess.

 

Boy, I say boy, never spank a Sucky when he's spiralling down.

 

So Kane = initiated contact/fouled lallana

And mo = dived

Ok Mr Lineker

You were so close too

 

Did Kane buy a penalty yesterday. Yay or nay?

 

No, try reading.

 

Im asking you.

Did Kane cheat to win that pen?

 

No. He put himself between Lallana and the ball, so that he'd be fouled.
Salah was fouled and then dived. Penalty and simulation. He cheated and he also deserved the penalty.
Both are penalties, but they're not the same thing and shouldn't be compared. They're not remotely similar.

 

Surely the question with regards the Kane incident is what the **** is an experienced player like Lallana doing making that ridiculous challenge on the edge of the box, Kane is waiting for him thats not in question, but Lallana must know that he cannot win the ball fairly so I think he is also trying to be clever and hoping that he gets the foul for Kane making the back. They get given both ways seen loads of matches where these are given either way, on this occasion I think the clumsiness of Lallanas effort has convinced all of the officials that he was the offender hence the decision in our favour.

 

So lallanas fault for going for a ball he had every right to try and win.

Not kanes for looking at him, then backing into him and then going to ground.

Haha

 

He did have every right to go for the ball. He didn't get it and got Kane, instead. That's called a foul.
Kane knowing that he was going to be fouled doesn't undo it, somehow. It's a stupid challenge from the ex-Scouser.

 

My team in Cyprus, this will be interesting I have never seen a team in Cyprus play hoof ball.

 

[

Lailana is not the sharpest tool in the box, but he may be one of the biggest ...

https://www.not606.com/threads/2017-18-pl2-thread.350654/page-9#post-11425738

 

it's not abandoned i'll have you know it's just i'm often away in my second home .