Nothing wisecrack about it. you have had the definition. adult human female that is it. you have had that answer from three posters. do you think an adult female human is a woman?? very simple question there.
Jiffie has not been about since the end of April, he is a valued member and well missed, he is a very intelligent guy with strong opinions and a combatative nature, maybe he is having a break until the new season starts, I hope he is well and our forum would welcome him back in the future or at a time to suit him.
Notice Onefors not been here either. Maybe they are sunning themselves in Ibiza having it large like Kevin and Perry together
I replied without really having digested the comments in the media .. which basically stated letters and thwarted at last minute by judgement from european source.. All has been since explained a different entity to EU RIGHTS .... STARTED UP ABOUT 50 60 years ago.
Funny how this ECHR is not stopping the boats from leaving France. Surely that is far more dangerous to the rmigrants than going to Rwanda? Everyone has always known that the UK is the favoured destination as they get everything they want handed to them here, and the refusal to go to Rwanda proves this. If it really were that they feared for their lives in their own country, then anywhere would be better. It's all BS
We can all look up the dictionary literal definition, that wasn’t really my point. You are obviously avoiding providing your opinion, or maybe you don’t have one, other than the literal one.
I’m sure they would if France were arranging the boats, they don’t have jurisdiction over illegal trafficking
To me this is the definition, a female, by birth has those characteristics; whereas, a woman, who may or may have not been born that way does not. It's crystal clear to me, not sure why everyone is getting confused? In the modern world a female and a woman are not necessarily the same.
The EU is nothing to do with the European Commission on Human Rights (ECHR) It's a separate council body that we signed up to around 70 years ago, and which we may need to exit from to deport not only these illegals who have no right to be here, but also convicted murderers, rapists and drug dealers that we also haven't easily been able to deport due to more lawyers getting injunctions to halt British law/judicial system, or we have to find an alternative method for bypassing it so that they can't do so in future and we really can make decisions that cannot be challenged.
Now I understand your point. Thank you, can’t say I’ve thought of it like that before, food for thought.