So you saying 'I was right' is actually you talking bollocks. You've already ****ed up over flop-gate, when Lacazette scored twice in 4 games in pre-season. Now we have more of your **** up predictions to look forward to Thanks mate.
Hang on! Didn't you say that pre-season form is bollocks? Make up your mind, Pix! If I was playing your tragic game of self-love and loathing, I'd be claiming points, there! Be that as it may, I was just pointing out that I am right about Lacazette, it's just that won't be able to see that until the season wears on. Watch this space, and stop keep banging on about it. It serves only to make you look foolish, mate.
Oh dear, you've walked straight into the same **** up yet again. You will remember that I was quizzing you about pre-season after your PSG **** fest, as to whether it was an indication of form. You got very agitated and said 'Of course it is!'. You will also remember that at that point I pointed out that Lacazette had scored and thus you had ****ed up over flop-gate. So by your own logic you are repeating the same **** up yet again
Oh, dear, Pix! You are getting yourself into a right pickle, aren't you! This isn't about what I think of pre-season games; it's about what you think about them! You have ****ed up massively, I'm afraid. Mark the points up, mate. On the one hand, you were slagging off pre-season games, now you're claiming that because Lacazette scored two goals in 4 pre-season games, it proves that he's a World-beater! That's shameful back-tracking! But not surprising from you, mate.
No mate, I'm afraid you are wrong. I've said all along that pre-season games are simply training games. I was using your logic, where you were creaming your pants over the PSG game, and again when you said that 'Of course (pre-season) it's a ****ing indication you muppet' You have claimed that Lacazette is a flop, but have also admitted by your own logic that he's not because he's already scored twice. And here you are continuing the same **** up That's another point awarded to me for the repeat of the WFU.
That cannot be so, Pix. I was quoting your previous position regarding pre-season games, and then comparing it with your change of stance. That aside, the key point to focus on (as you do have a tendency to wander off a topic) is that Lacazette will prove to be a flop in the Prem. I know that you don't want to admit that, but I cannot help that. You can quote me on this, Pix.
I'm afraid it is so mate. I haven't changed my stance. I am using your logic in which you have managed to contradict yourself over your claim that Lacazette is a flop. Talking of change of stance, again you are the one who tried to flip flop over the importance of pre-season games, switching from your outburst 'Of course it's an indication you ****ing muppet' and your flagrant **** fest after the PSG game, to your comment that your 3-0 tonking by City was only a 'meaningless friendly'
I've already managed to quote your flop-gate **** up several times, and the season hasn't even started yet
On the contrary mate. I haven't made any comments about Lacazette that will come back to haunt me. You on the other hand have, and will be the one doing the praying that Lacazette does flop.
Ah the Juggernaut of defeat. I see you've resorted to posting silly pics once you've realised you've been done again. Anyway, is this your 'Marquee signing' that you were certain Pooch was going to make: Tottenham boss Mauricio Pochettino is set to make Argentine goalkeeper Paulo Gazzaniga, 25, his first summer signing from Southampton in a £2m deal. (Sun)
Perhaps you got it wrong Pix, HIAG didnt mean a marquee signing, he meant a Marquis signing: please log in to view this image Only Trekkies will get this