Your inability to stand by the utter crap you post, never surprises me either. You said "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners" Which is total and utter s**te, as all they've done is back him with both fees and wages, it's him who made the decisions and him who's spunked the cash on crap. You attempting to shift even some of that blame onto the men who wrote the cheques is beyond idiotic, even by your low standards P.s. Spastic and mong? Classy as ever from you
I have to step in here, is it BR's decision to not sign the best ready made player? Of course not. We were interested in Falcao for instance but baulked at all the fees + his wages FOr you to suggest that a manager doesnt want the best players he can possibly get is pointing the idiotic arrow to yourself. A manager wants the best proven low risk players for every single position on the pitch More chance of him winning games + therefore boosting his own career Our owners have a way of operating, im not bashing it and will always be grateful to our owners for saving us. Im afraid you look the idiotic one here though to suggest they just give him the player he wants
So does anyone on this forum, apart from Tobes, think that "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners" translates to blaming the owners for Rodgers spunking £230m (in Tobes' words, not facts).
Nope although this forum does seem to have gone mad after today's result for some reason. #embarrassing
What's Falcao got to do with the actual point we were talking about? Oh yeah, that'll be f** all Soft Ollie's assertion that the owners are partly culpable for the failure of Rodgers signings is absolute bollocks, that's all that I was saying
Fair enough but what im saying is every manager wants the players with the best track record. BR wanted Falcao, a good striker, but we backed off, why? It isnt BR's money is it. We dont work that way, we sign potential. So my point was for you to say he's been backed to fees and wages to what he wanted I dont think he has, because a manger would always choose to sign a proven player than one with potential, for the majority of the time He has been backed though and of course BR has made some signings, like I said to you on the Manc board, he will live or die by his decisions, like all managers He has been backed but none of us will know if he got the players he wanted, given our strategy I would say not as ask any manager, They would always sign proven talent
Do you use that site? The Manc board is very busy there compared to on here. I wonder what your user names are on there
Your assertion isn't backed up by the simple facts though. You're making out that he's being forced to buy potential and work with kids. He's bought Lallana - 26, Lambert - 32, Lovren - 25, Sakho - 24 and Mad Mario - 24 of late. These aren't 'potential' they're experienced players ffs, you're just making bollocks excuses for his transfer f** ups
I only had one and it's the same as here. I haven't been on in years. As I said, the whole site is a cesspit of ignorant wums. I did enjoy winding up the spud fans on there so I guess I'm being a bit of a hypocrit, but it got boring if you wanted some intelligent debate. As for the manc board on here, quality not quantity
Lallana is a cut above the other 3, and I wouldn't even class him as superb just yet. Not until those 4 players look like they belong at Liverpool, not Spurs, could you class any as superb tbh.