Transfer Bollocks, Sorry, Rumours

Aston Villa want Ki for £6m

Celtic want Robbie Keane on loan

QPR want MacGregor

Spurs want Fraser Forster and James Forrest


Would take £6m for Ki but think we could get more (some Russian team were willing to pay £8m apparently).

Robbie Keane story is utter nonsense.

QPR need goals, not a goalie so not sure about that one.

Also can't see Spurs going for Forster but they have shown a lot of interest in Forrest. If they are to make a bid hopefully it'll be in the summer rather than in January.

 

I'd take the £6million for Ki

Robbie Keane can GTF... no more loans please, permanent signings who will add quaility to the squad.

White probably has the hun squad on e-bay!

If Spurs want Forrest then it better be a McGeady type bid of £10million. He's our most promising player with masses of potential.

 

nigga please

 

Mccoist and Whyte are sitting down on Friday to discuss Rangers war chest , will it be 25 million or 50 million or 2% of what they get for Jelavic ????

 

celtic - owned by billionaires - cant win the league
rangers - absolutely skint - champions 3 years running

 

By spending money you didn't have ya ****ing dobber

 

We didn't spend for roughly 2 years you daft ****er.

 

You still spent £4m on Jelly and another couple of million on Weiss and Beattie

And it cost you another million just to get Beattie to leave

Let's put it another way: the front two who started against Celtic (Jelly and Lafferty) cost a combined total of £7.8m

You've spent plenty over the past few years.

 

Lets put it another way, Lafferty was signed at the start of Walter Smiths reign. Beattie and Jelavic where signed last year. Weiss was a loan signing

Now ST it is question time between Lafferty signing and Beattie and Jelavic signing how many years are there?

PS. 8M for Ki and yous crack jokes about Jelavic

 

What does it matter?

How much money did Smith spend between his return and going off to manage Barcelona or Man Utd or wherever the hell he is? £35m+ plus I believe.

 

And does that take into account who has been sold or is it just more ****e your spouting, i seem to remember a certain Hutton going for £9M and a certain Cueller going for £7.8M.

Even if your £35M tag is correct £16.8M is almost half of that and thats no including our other sales, your argument is ****e give up.

 

Apparently, we are interested in signing a 22-year old Southend striker called Matt Paterson. Don't know about the fee though. We're also interested in Kevin Doyle of Wolves.

 

And how much was your debt during this time? That money should have been spent putting the club on an even keel.

Rangers are the football equivalent of some ned family buying TVs and digi boxes out of Bright House when you should have been saving the money for future financial tough times which you knew were coming.

 

Can we please leave the childish Rangers jibes alone and concentrate on us? If Rangers are skint, all the better for us. Lennon has something to prove in the transfer market as his signings to date have not been stellar.

 

True Blue

Your pathetic attempts at wums may have worked occasionally on BBC606 but every Celtic fan on here to a man (and a woman) knows you're just a WUM so what the **** is the point?

 

Why did we need to set things right, we won the league and someone else came in and paid the lloyds debts off, overall i think it was a sound business plan.

 

Ho ho ho

 

Aye, it's all rosy right enough.

Debt's paid off is it?

 

you can't win a 2 team league